Vandetanib

The safety of vandetanib for the treatment of thyroid cancer

Venessa HM Tsang, Bruce G Robinson & Diana L Learoyd

To cite this article: Venessa HM Tsang, Bruce G Robinson & Diana L Learoyd (2016): The safety of vandetanib for the treatment of thyroid cancer, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1201060
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2016.1201060

Accepted author version posted online: 14 Jun 2016.
Published online: 14 Jun 2016. Submit your article to this journal

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ieds20

Download by: [La Trobe University] Date: 15 June 2016, At: 21:45

Publisher: Taylor & Francis

Journal: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety

DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1201060
The safety of vandetanib for the treatment of thyroid cancer

Venessa HM Tsang1, 2, Bruce G Robinson1, 2, and Diana L Learoyd 1, 2

1.Department of Endocrinology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney NSW 2065, Australia
2.Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia

Corresponding author details: Dr Venessa Tsang [email protected]

ABSTRACT Introduction:
The tyrosine kinase inhibitor vandetanib was approved for use in 2012 for aggressive and symptomatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease. As the first effective systemic therapy for MTC, vandetanib is a major step forward and the phase III study suggests an important role for this agent. Trials have also been performed for its use in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) though it is not yet approved for use for this indication.

Areas covered:

The efficacy and safety of vandetanib is discussed. Studies suggest improvement in progression- free survival (PFS) without clear overall survival benefit but with manageable low grade toxicities and improved quality of life on therapy.

Expert opinion:

Vandetanib has an important role in the management of patients with progressive metastatic MTC. The use in patients with stable or asymptomatic disease has no proven benefit. The side effects can usually be managed with dose reduction, interruption, and/or specific symptomatic therapy.

Keywords

Vandetanib, thyroid cancer, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, safety, side effect management

1.INTRODUCTION

Thyroid cancer incidence around the world has doubled over the last decade. This is largely due to increased ascertainment of early cases, but despite the good overall prognosis there is an annual mortality of around 3% in the United States of America.1 90% of thyroid cancer cases are differentiated (DTC) arising from the thyroid follicular cells and these usually take up iodine which can be used in therapy.2 One to two percent of cases are medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), arising from the neuroendocrine calcitonin- producing C cells, which do not take up iodine.3 twenty five percent of these MTC cases are familial, part of the multiple endocrine neoplasia
type 2 syndromes (MEN 2). Anaplastic thyroid cancer accounts for the remainder and is rare but rapidly fatal.4 Most cases of DTC are curable but in about 8% of cases metastatic disease occurs which becomes resistant to radioiodine ablation and systemic therapies are required.2 MTC is more often metastatic than DTC and has a worse prognosis with a 10-year survival of around
65%.3, 5 Surgery has been the only effective form of therapy for MTC until the recent advent of

targeted systemic therapies. Studies of the familial forms of MTC identified second messenger pathways upregulated by germline mutations and activation of the causative oncogene RET (“Rearranged during Transfection”), which led to targeted drug design. Up to 60% of sporadic MTCs have somatic RET mutations making targeted therapies logical for both familial and sporadic MTCs.3, 6-8

Vandetanib was developed to inhibit the RET kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) types 2 and 3 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling, ie a multi-

9, 10
kinase inhibitor.
As with all multi-kinase inhibitors, a spectrum of potential toxicities may

arises.

In 2012 vandetanib was licensed by the US FDA and the European Medicines agency (EMA) for use in symptomatic or progressive MTC.11 Improved progression-free survival (PFS) was demonstrated for vandetanib use in patients with metastatic MTC in double blind placebo- controlled phaseII and III trials.12-14 An additional study focused on vandetanib use in children and adolescents with hereditary MTC.15 A phase II trial evaluating vandetanib use in radioiodine refractory and progressive DTC was also conducted with favourable results.16 Quality of life
was also shown to improve with active drug, despite the toxicity.3, 14

Thus far there has been no difference in overall survival demonstrated for vandetanib versus placebo in either MTC or DTC but the trials have been designed to allow crossover from placebo to active drug when objective evidence of disease progression was determined based on investigator assessment, making overall survival difficult to assess.
Toxicity and dosing have been well studied. The highest approved dose based on tolerability studies is 300mg, and dose-limiting toxicities include diarrhoea, skin rash, hypertension, headache, fatigue, loss of appetite and QT prolongation. Excess mortality attributable to the active drug has been around 1.5%, 16 consistent with other TKIs, and toxicity is generally manageable with dose reduction. Further studies are needed to define the individual patients who are likely to have the greatest benefit to toxicity ratio in view of the morbidity and cost of these therapies.17

2.REVIEW

2.1Mechanism of Action

The chemical name for vandetanib is N-(4-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)-6-methoxy-7-[(1- methylpiperidin-4-yl) methoxy] quinazolin-4-amine and its molecular formula is C22H24BrFN4O2. (Figure 1)
Vandetanib is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor (TKI) that potentially inhibits VEGFR- 2 tyrosine kinase (TK) activity in enzyme assays (IC50=40nM) and shows inhibitory activity against RET receptor TK (IC50=100nM), against Flt-4 (VEGFR-3, IC50=110nM), and against

EGFR (IC50=500nM) TKs.
9, 10

In in vitro models of angiogenesis, VEGF-stimulated endothelial cell migration, proliferation, survival and new blood vessel formation is inhibited by vandetanib. (Figure 2) In human xenograft models of lung cancer in athymic mice vandetanib reduced tumour microvessel density, tumour cell-induced angiogenesis, tumour vessel permeability and tumour growth and metastases in vivo. EGFR-dependent cell proliferation and cell survival is reduced in vitro as is the activity of other kinases such as RET and VEGFR-3. Vandetanib has antagonist activity
9, 10
against histamine receptors and an alpha adrenergic receptor subtype.

2.2Pharmacokinetics and dynamics

The plasma half- life of the 300mg dose is approximately 19 days, with a clearance of 13 litres per hour and distribution volume of 7450 litres. Absorption after oral administration is slow; peak plasma concentrations occur at 4-10 hours, but vandetanib accumulates after multiple doses with a steady state achieved at 2 months. Vandetanib is 90% protein-bound; to serum albumin and other proteins, and metabolized by CYP3A4. Metabolites are seen in plasma, urine (25%) and faeces (44%) and caution is required if concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors are used.16

Dosing is by a single daily dose, with or without food. Reductions in dose are recommended when there is toxicity (see later) and these dosing guidelines are clear in the product information (PI).18 Safety in children over the age of 5 has been evaluated15, but the drug is not yet approved for this age group. There is limited data in the elderly over the age of 75. No change in starting dose is recommended for the elderly or for those with impaired renal function unless creatinine clearance is below 50 ml/min. A reduction in dose is wise for moderate renal impairment but not needed for moderate hepatic impairment. Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance below
20-30 ml/min) and hepatic impairment (Child Pugh class B or C) would be contraindications to vandetanib use.. Overdosage is treated symptomatically; the drug should be halted and an ECG performed within 24 hours. Tablet sizes are 100mg or 300mg and tablets should be stored under 30oC.

2.3Clinical Applications and Efficacy

Vandetanib has been studied in phase I, II and III studies in MTC3 and in phase I and II studies in DTC.16 Parameters studied include overall objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, (DCR) and duration of response (DOR), defined as stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) and complete response (CR), according to RECIST criteria, as well as effect on calcitonin, CEA levels, QTc interval; incidence and type of adverse events, clinically significant lab abnormalities, ECG changes and vital signs.

Phase III studies are crucial to the analysis of thyroid cancer treatment outcomes as the natural history of the disease can be indolent in MTC. Single arm studies have been confounded by the

temptation to include stable disease (SD) as objective evidence of benefit. It is important to note that patients were only recruited to the phase III study if there was evidence of recent progression based on RECIST criteria. 14
In treatment of MTC, vandetanib was evaluated in an open label single arm phase II study13; at a dose of 300mg per day in 30 patients with locally advanced or metastatic hereditary MTC and 6/30 patients or 20% had some objective tumour response with acceptable toxicity13.
Another study12 performed was in a similar cohort but using 100mg per day in 19 patients and showing 3/19 or 15.8% objective response rates.

Wells et al.14 performed an international phase III randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study comparing 300mg per day to placebo in 331 patients with locally advanced or metastatic MTC.16 There were 231 patients in the active treatment arm, 99 in the placebo arm and one patient randomized to placebo who did not receive it. Treated patients had a 54% reduction in rate of progression (Hazard ratio or HR was 0.46 with 95% confidence intervals CI 0.31 to 0.69 and p=0.0001). Partial responses were observed in 45% of treated patients with predicted median duration of response of 22 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.3 months for the placebo arm and for vandetanib was not reached but predicted to be 30.5 months (95% CI 25 to 36 months). There has been no difference in overall survival thus far between the 2 groups, placebo vs vandetanib, however at 12 months, the proportion of patients alive and progression-free was 63 (63%) for the placebo arm and 192 (83%) for patients randomized to vandetanib. “Common terminology criteria for an adverse event greater than or equal to grade 2” (CTCAE≥2) was 55% and CTCAE≥3 was 10% after the first 3 months with no evidence of cumulative toxicity over time. (Tables 2 and 3.)

PFS benefits were observed in patients who had germline or somatic RET mutations and in those without RET mutation. Unfortunately RET mutation status was not known in 41% of patients. Previous in vitro studies have suggested that codon 804 RET mutations are associated with vandetanib resistance, though to be due to low tyrosine kinase activity of the kinase molecule16 Safety Evaluation
The most frequent adverse events are listed in table 2, and are consistent with the known mechanism of action of VEGFR and EGFR inhibition. They are described in detail below. Similar toxicity profiles were seen in the studies where vandetanib was used in the treatment of radioiodine refractory locally advanced or metastatic DTC. 16 It should be noted that nearly all patients receiving either vandetanib or placebo experienced an AE in the phase III trial on metastatic MTC.16 Overall more patients required dose reduction of vandetanib compared with placebo at 35% vs 3%. The overall rate of vandetanib treatment discontinuation because of toxicity was low at 12% (28 patients) vs 3% (3 patients) in the placebo arm, despite a median duration of treatment of approximately 90 weeks.

2.4Adverse Events

2.4.1Skin Reactions

Rash, dry skin, acne, photosensitivity, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and even fatal Stevens

16, 18-20
Johnson syndrome have been reported with vandetanib.
Reactions were seen in 88% of

treated vs 23% of placebo-controlled patients and most were CTCAE grade 1 or 2. However 7% of treated patients had grade 3 reactions. The mean time to onset was 103 days and ranged from 10 to 316. One grade 4 rash was seen in a treated patient. Symptomatic treatment (including

topical or systemic steroids, antihistamines and antibiotics) was generally successful. Photosensitivity was a feature of these reactions and sunscreen or extra clothing was recommended at the start of treatment.

2.4.2Diarrhoea

Advanced MTC commonly causes diarrhoea through calcitonin hypersecretion. In the Phase III trial by Wells et al.14 it was seen in 56% treated patients vs 26% placebo controlled patients. CTCAE ≥3 grade diarrhoea was seen in 10% treated patients and the mean time to onset was 151 days with a range of 9 to 415. It was generally managed by standard symptomatic therapies including loperamide, codeine and somatostatin analogues. The author’s personal observation is that patients with pre-existing diarrhoea commonly had some relief on treatment but that some patients had worsening diarrhoea with the drug, and it is recommended that patients with grade
3-4 diarrhoea cease vandetanib until improvement and resume at a lower dose. Electrolytes should be carefully monitored. It has been proposed that activity against GIT expressed EGFR may contribute to drug related diarrhea.

2.4.3Hypertension

In the study by Wells et al.14 the incidence of hypertension was 31% in the treated group vs 5% on the placebo group of patients and CTCAE≥3 grade was seen in 7% (16 patients) treated and 1% (1 patient) placebo groups. Approximately 2% patients had severe hypertension in the treated group. Blood pressure elevation usually occurred within the first few weeks of therapy and usually responded to routine anti-hypertensive medication such as calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II- receptor antagonists, as is

suggested in recent hypertension guidelines.21 Daily blood pressure monitoring may be performed during the first few weeks of treatment.

2.4.4Nausea, Vomiting/Elevated Liver Function Tests (LFTs)

Nausea occurred in 33% of treated vs 16% of placebo-controlled patients and vomiting in 14 % vs 7%, but most events were grade 1 or 2. Elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is common, usually mild and commonly resolves spontaneously, without dose interruption. If not, a drug interruption of 1-2 weeks is recommended.

2.4.5Fatigue

This symptom was commonly reported in both arms of study 58 (at about 25% for all categories for both treated and placebo arms during the first year of therapy), but CTCAE≥2 grade was 14% for treated patients vs 10% for placebo and ≥3grade was 5% for treated patients vs 1% for placebo. Fatigue is best managed with dose reduction or a ‘drug holiday’ of 1-2 weeks.

2.4.6Headache

This was generally related to hypertension and was reported in 25% of treated vs 9% of placebo controlled patients.

2.4.7Cardiac Toxicity; QTc prolongation

Vandetanib is contra-indicated in patients with congenital long QT syndrome, where the QT interval corrected by heart rate is >440ms.22 Studies have precluded the concomitant use of other medications known to prolong the QT interval or those at risk of causing torsade de pointes; the

so-called “group 1 antiarrhythmic” drugs of which there are 30 agents including amiodarone and several anti-emetic agents. Caution has been advised in the concomitant use of “group 2 antiarrrhythmic” drugs where the risk of torsade is suggested but unproven (45 agents) eg Octreotide, Ondansetron and Venlafaxine. (Table 4)23

QTc prolongation to ≥550milliseconds (ms) using Bazett’s correction, (or increase of 100ms from baseline) is managed by withholding vandetanib until such time as the QTc falls below 480ms or baseline and then resumption at a lower dose, and close follow-up is recommended. Target levels of serum K (>4mmol/L), Ca (normal) and Mg (normal) and TSH (normal) are advised. After drug cessation it can take some time for the problem to resolve due to the 19 day half-life of vandetanib.

In the paper by Wells et al,14 scheduled 12-lead ECGs were performed during screening and at 1, 2, 4, 12 weeks and every 3 months thereafter. 19 patients or 8% developed protocol-defined QTc prolongation but there were no reports of torsade de points.

2.4.8Elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)

An increase in thyroid hormone replacement dose was needed more in treated patients (49%) vs in placebo-controlled patients (17%). It is recommended that TSH be measured at baseline and at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after drug commencement and every 3 months thereafter, and that Thyroxine doses should be adjusted appropriately.24 Thyroxine doses are adjusted to suppress TSH in the management of DTC but not in MTC.

2.4.9Rare toxicities

Heart failure, interstitial lung disease, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic events, reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome and pancreatitis have all been observed in patients taking vandetanib, but without a clear causative relationship. Patients with significant heart
failure (New York Heart Association NYHA classification ≥2) or significant bleeding should not be treated with vandetanib.25

2.4.10Fertility and pregnancy

Studies in rodents have suggested embryofoetal toxicity and use in pregnancy is category D so contraception is emphasized before and during vandetanib use in women of childbearing age.

2.5Safety in special populations and Pharmacogenomics

The initial phase I dose escalation study of vandetanib was performed in a Japanese population in non small cell lung cancer patients26, which revealed a dose of 300mg daily as being tolerable with acceptable side effects including hypertension, diarrhea, headache, skin eruptions and liver function abnormalities, in a small sample size of 18 patients.

Vandetanib has been studied in the Chinese population in a Phase I, non randomized, open labelled, single centre trial of 12 patients in each arm of 100mg second daily, 100mg daily, or 300mg daily dosing.27 The pharmacokinetics, tolerability and tumour response was assessed and compared to existing data in Western and Japanese populations. The results revealed no difference between Chinese populations and Western population with 300mg being well

tolerated, and comparable absorption (2-10 hours), plasma clearance (7.8-9.2L/hour), and no prolongation of the QTc in this small sample size.

Patients without RET mutations may have decreased benefit from the use of vandetanib, though there are no current data on the role of pharmacogenomics and use of vandetanib on MTC and DTC.18, 28

2.6Comparison with safety of other drugs

Other TKIs have been studied but are not yet widely prescribed in either MTC or DTC, although Cabozantinib is licensed for use in MTC and Lenvatinib is now widely available for use in DTC. The AE profile is similar across the TKI spectrum, with differences explained by the different receptors affected.

Lenvatinib has less activity against EGFR than does vandetanib and thus carries a lower risk of skin rash. Lenvatinib seems to have earlier efficacy with clinical benefit seen within weeks rather than months. Vandetanib has a higher risk of prolonged QTc than does Lenvatinib and in the specific context of ectopic ACTH production by metastatic MTC, the metabolic effects of excess cortisol on blood pressure and cardiac function create the potential for cardiac toxicity of vandetanib. Vandetanib nevertheless remains a useful agent for the treatment of ectopic ACTH syndrome in MTC patients.29-31

3.CONCLUSION

Vandetanib has a clear role in the management of MTC and is an option for iodine-refractory DTC. While the side effect profile of the TKIs is similar, the cardiac problems encountered by patients with vandetanib are greater than with other TKIs. Side effects can generally be managed with dose reduction and careful monitoring. The major benefit is the prolongation of
progression- free survival.

4.EXPERT OPINION

Vandetanib is a major improvement over existing therapies in MTC as the first effective systemic therapy for advanced metastatic disease. In DTC it offers an alternative systemic therapy for poorly differentiated cases refractory to radioiodine treatment, though it is not currently approved for its use. It should preferably be used in patients with a significant tumour burden and/or those with active tumour growth.32
Current treatment strategies are likely to be enhanced and broadened for patients with poorly differentiated tumours although long term survival benefit has yet to be demonstrated.
The physicians prescribing the drug are likely to be oncologists, who are experienced with TKIs, some endocrinologists, and selected nuclear physicians. Drug funding models in different countries may restrict use and further tumor characterization and analysis of individual drug metabolizing enzymes may result in specific drug selection.
Data still needed are better analysis of long term survival outcomes, better sub-categorisation of sites of disease most likely to respond (eg soft tissues over bone or liver) and better prediction of toxicity especially in elderly patients.

In 5 years’ time vandetanib is likely to be one of several TKIs used in MTC therapy, and likely used in combination with other agents.
Declaration of Interest

BG Robinson has acted as investigator for AstraZeneca, Eisai and Eilixir. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

DRUG SUMMARY BOX

Drug name Vandetanib (Caprelsa) (ZD6474)
Phase III
Indication Advanced progressive MTC
Mechanism of Action Tyrosine kinase inhibition (anti-RET, anti- VEGFR, EGFR)
Route of Administration Oral
Chemical Structure Figure 1
Pivotal trials Phase II Robinson et al. J. Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95(6) 2664-71. [12]
Phase III Wells SA Jr et al. J Clin Oncol. Jan 2012;30(2):134-141. [14]

Figure 1. Chemical structure for vandetanib N-(4-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)-6-methoxy-7-[(1- methylpiperidin-4-yl)methoxy]quinazolin-4-amine and its molecular formula is C22H24BrFN4O2)

Figure 2. Vandetanib inhibits kinase signaling pathways activated by RET and EGFR in tumour cells and by VEGFR in vascular endothelial cells. Ligand binding to the receptor leads to phosphorylation (P) and stimulation of signal transduction cascades leading to gene expression and cell proliferation, cell invasion, angiogenesis with inhibition of apoptosis. The MAP Kinase pathway (RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK) and the PI3K /AKT/mTOR (phosphatidyl-inositol-3 kinase)pathway may be inhibited by TKI therapy. The PTEN tumour suppressor gene also inhibits PI3K pathway signaling.

TABLE 1 Key efficacy findings in Phase III Trial. Data taken from (Wells et al 2012)14

Primary analysis

Progression-free survival (PFS) Vandet 300mg
Placebo

N

73/231 51/100

Median PFS months

Not reached (predicted 30.5) 19.3 P value

0.0001
Secondary efficacy end points Objective response rate (ORR) Vandet 300mg
Placebo

104/231 13/100 Response rate %

45

13

<0.001 Disease control rate (DCR) Vandet 300mg Placebo 200/231 71/100 87 71 0.001 Calcitonin response Vandet 300mg Placebo 160/231 3/100 69 3 <0.001 Overall survival (OS) Vandet 300mg Placebo 32/231 16/100 Median OS Not reached Not reached 0.712 Time to worsening of pain (TWP) Vandet 300mg 114/231 Median TWP months 7.85 0.006 Placebo 57/100 3.25 TABLE 2 Summary of common adverse events Phase III Trial (Wells et al 2012) at frequency >10%. Data taken from 14

Vandetanib 300mg N=231

% Placebo N=99

%
GIT Diarrhoea Nausea
Reduced appetite Reduced weight

56

33

21

10

26

16

12

9
Fatigue 24 23
Investigations Prolonged QT

14

1
Insomnia 13 10
Respiratory cough 11 10
Skin Grade 3 or worse rash Photosensitivity
Rash overall 4

13

45 1

0

11
Headache 26 9
Hypertension 32 5

TABLE 3 Common laboratory abnormalities. Data taken from 14

Parameter Vandetanib 300mg

% Placebo

%
Proteinuria 1+ or greater dipstick 91 28
Haematuria 1+ or greater dipstick 34 22
Hypocalcaemia 11 3
Increased TSH 18 1
Increased creatinine all grades 16 1
Increased serum amylase all grades 24 15
Increased serum lipase all grades 24 11

Table 4: Drugs known to cause Torsade de Pointe (TdP) Data taken from 18, 23

Drug (Generic Name) Comment
Albuterol (parenteral) Inhaled form at normal doses acceptable
Amiodarone F>M
Arsenic trioxide
Bepridil F>M
Chlorpromazine
Chloroquine
Cisapride
Disopyramide
Dofetilide
Domperidone
Droperidol
Erythromycin F>M
Halofantrine F>M
Haloperidol
Ibutilide F>M
Levomethadyl
Mesoridazine
Methadone F>M
Pentamidine F>M
Pimozide F>M

Procainamide
Quinidine F>M
Salbutamol (parenteral) Inhaled form at normal doses acceptable
Sotalol F>M
Sparfloxacin
Thioridazine
Group 1 drugs have a risk of causing Torsade de Pointes and should not be used concomitantly with vandetanib. They should not be used within 2 weeks of starting nor for 4 weeks after discontinuation of vandetanib.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: * of interest
** of considerable interest

1.Mao Y, Xing M. Recent incidences and differential trends of thyroid cancer in the United States. Endocr Relat Cancer 2016 Feb 25.
2.Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016 Jan;26(1):1-133. ●● A comprehensive analysis of the literature with levels of evidence provided.
3.Wells SA, Jr., Asa SL, Dralle H, Elisei R, Evans DB, Gagel RF, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2015 Jun;25(6):567- 610. ●● A comprehensive analysis of the literature with levels of evidence provided.
4.Smallridge RC, Ain KB, Asa SL, Bible KC, Brierley JD, Burman KD, et al. American Thyroid Association guidelines for management of patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2012 Nov;22(11):1104-39.
5.Kwon H, Kim WG, Sung TY, Jeon MJ, Song DE, Lee YM, et al. Changing trends in the clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Journal of surgical oncology 2016 Feb;113(2):152-8.
6.Elisei R, Cosci B, Romei C, Bottici V, Renzini G, Molinaro E, et al. Prognostic significance of somatic RET oncogene mutations in sporadic medullary thyroid cancer: a 10-year follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008 Mar;93(3):682-7.
7.Carlomagno F. Thyroid Cancer: Role of RET and Beyond. European thyroid journal 2012 Apr;1(1):15-23.
8.de Groot JW, Links TP, Plukker JT, Lips CJ, Hofstra RM. RET as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in sporadic and hereditary endocrine tumors. Endocrine reviews 2006 Aug;27(5):535-60.
9.Carlomagno F, Vitagliano D, Guida T, Ciardiello F, Tortora G, Vecchio G, et al. ZD6474, an orally available inhibitor of KDR tyrosine kinase activity, efficiently blocks oncogenic RET kinases. Cancer research 2002 Dec 15;62(24):7284-90. ●● An early pre-clinical study showing that vandetanib inhibits signaling through RET kinase.
10.Wedge SR, Ogilvie DJ, Dukes M, Kendrew J, Chester R, Jackson JA, et al. ZD6474 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, angiogenesis, and tumor growth following oral administration. Cancer research 2002 Aug 15;62(16):4645-55.
11.Thornton K, Kim G, Maher VE, Chattopadhyay S, Tang S, Moon YJ, et al. Vandetanib for the treatment of symptomatic or progressive medullary thyroid cancer in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease: U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary. Clin Cancer Res 2012 Jul 15;18(14):3722-30. ● A good summary of the rationale, clinical efficacy and toxicity of vandetanib.
12.Robinson BG, Paz-Ares L, Krebs A, Vasselli J, Haddad R. Vandetanib (100 mg) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010 Jun;95(6):2664-71. ● Phase II analysis of the 100mg vandetanib dose in patients with familial MTC.

13.Wells SA, Jr., Gosnell JE, Gagel RF, Moley J, Pfister D, Sosa JA, et al. Vandetanib for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010 Feb 10;28(5):767-72. ● Phase II analysis of the 300mg vandetanib dose in patients with familial MTC.
14.Wells SA, Jr., Robinson BG, Gagel RF, Dralle H, Fagin JA, Santoro M, et al. Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2012 Jan 10;30(2):134-41. ●● The international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double- blind, phase III study evaluating 300mg/day vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic MTC.
15.Fox E, Widemann BC, Chuk MK, Marcus L, Aikin A, Whitcomb PO, et al. Vandetanib in children and adolescents with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B associated medullary thyroid carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2013 Aug 1;19(15):4239-48.
16.Leboulleux S, Bastholt L, Krause T, de la Fouchardiere C, Tennvall J, Awada A, et al. Vandetanib in locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012 Sep;13(9):897-905.
17.Karras S, Anagnostis P, Krassas GE. Vandetanib for the treatment of thyroid cancer: an update. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2014 Mar;10(3):469-81.
18.Pharmaceuticals; A. Caprelsa (vandetanib) Prescribing information. . Wilmington, DE: 2014.
19.Johansson S, Read J, Oliver S, Steinberg M, Li Y, Lisbon E, et al. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of the co-administrations of vandetanib and metformin, digoxin, midazolam, omeprazole or ranitidine.[Erratum appears in Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014 Nov;53(11):1063]. Clin Pharmacokinet 2014 Sep;53(9):837-47.
20.Chougnet CN, Borget I, Leboulleux S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bonichon F, Criniere L, et al. Vandetanib for the treatment of advanced medullary thyroid cancer outside a clinical trial: results from a French cohort. Thyroid 2015 Apr;25(4):386-91.
21.Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB, Mann S, Lindholm LH, Kenerson JG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. Journal of hypertension 2014 Jan;32(1):3-15.
22.Zang J, Wu S, Tang L, Xu X, Bai J, Ding C, et al. Incidence and risk of QTc interval prolongation among cancer patients treated with vandetanib: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2012;7(2):e30353.
23.[cited 2016 10th March 2016]; Available from: https://crediblemeds.org/
24.Brassard M, Neraud B, Trabado S, Salenave S, Brailly-Tabard S, Borget I, et al. Endocrine effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor vandetanib in patients treated for thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011 Sep;96(9):2741-9.
25.Scheffel RS, Dora JM, Siqueira DR, Burttet LM, Cerski MR, Maia AL. Toxic cardiomyopathy leading to fatal acute cardiac failure related to vandetanib: a case report with histopathological analysis. Eur 2013 Jun;168(6):K51-4.
26.Tamura T, Minami H, Yamada Y, Yamamoto N, Shimoyama T, Murakami H, et al. A phase I dose- escalation study of ZD6474 in Japanese patients with solid, malignant tumors. Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 2006 Nov;1(9):1002-9.
27.Zhang L, Li S, Zhang Y, Zhan J, Zou BY, Smith R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of vandetanib in Chinese patients with solid, malignant tumors: an open-label, phase I, rising multiple-dose study. Clin Ther 2011 Mar;33(3):315-27.

28.Gild ML, Bullock M, Robinson BG, Clifton-Bligh R. Multikinase inhibitors: a new option for the treatment of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011 Oct;7(10):617-24.
29.Baudry C, Paepegaey AC, Groussin L. Reversal of Cushing’s syndrome by vandetanib in medullary thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2013 Aug 8;369(6):584-6. ● A case report showing that vandetanib can control the hormonal effects of ectopic ACTH-associated Cushing’s syndrome by controlling MTC tumour growth.
30.Nella AA, Lodish MB, Fox E, Balis FM, Quezado MM, Whitcomb PO, et al. Vandetanib successfully controls medullary thyroid cancer-related Cushing syndrome in an adolescent patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014 Sep;99(9):3055-9.
31.Pitoia F, Bueno F, Schmidt A, Lucas S, Cross G. Rapid response of hypercortisolism to vandetanib treatment in a patient with advanced medullary thyroid cancer and ectopic Cushing syndrome. Archives of endocrinology and metabolism 2015 Aug;59(4):343-6.
32.Chatal JF, Kraeber-Bodere F, Goldenberg DM, Barbet J. Treatment of metastatic medullary thyroid cancer with vandetanib: need to stratify patients on basis of calcitonin doubling time. J Clin Oncol 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2165; author reply 66-7.